Demographics details for Rosholt, WI vs Turner, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rosholt, WI vs Turner, OR.
| Data | Rosholt | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 470 | 2,422 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $55,313 | $101,292 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 61.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rosholt vs Turner
- The population in Turner is higher at 2,422, compared to 470 in Rosholt.
- Residents in Rosholt have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 38.6 years in Turner.
- Turner has a higher median income of $101,292, compared to $55,313 in Rosholt.
- In Turner, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 42.0% in Rosholt.
- Rosholt has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Turner.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Rosholt and Turner at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Rosholt vs Turner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rosholt | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 94 | 77 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rosholt vs Turner
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Rosholt and Turner at 0%.
- Rosholt has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 77% in Turner.
- In Turner, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Rosholt.
- Turner has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 3% in Rosholt.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Turner at 5%, compared to 3% in Rosholt.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rosholt and Turner at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rosholt | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 28.2% |
| Smoking | 14.0% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.6% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 31.4% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rosholt vs Turner
- In Turner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.1% in Rosholt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Turner at 28.2% versus 23.2% in Rosholt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rosholt at 14.0% compared to 13.7% in Turner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rosholt at 24.6% compared to 18.0% in Turner.
- Turner has higher obesity rates at 33.6% compared to 31.4% in Rosholt.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rosholt at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Turner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rosholt | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 28.3% (133) | 12.8% (311) |
| Less than High School | 15.3% (72) | 9.2% (223) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (41) | 23.3% (564) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rosholt vs Turner
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Rosholt and Turner at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosholt hold a high school diploma at 28.3% compared to 12.8% in Turner.
- More residents in Rosholt have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 9.2% in Turner.
- In Turner, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.3% compared to 8.7% in Rosholt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.