Demographics details for Rosholt, WI vs Greenbelt, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rosholt, WI vs Greenbelt, MD.
Data | Rosholt | Greenbelt |
---|---|---|
Population | 470 | 24,360 |
Median Age | 43.9 years | 37.2 years |
Median Income | $55,313 | $82,019 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Rosholt vs Greenbelt
- The population in Greenbelt is higher at 24,360, compared to 470 in Rosholt.
- Residents in Rosholt have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 37.2 years in Greenbelt.
- Greenbelt has a higher median income of $82,019, compared to $55,313 in Rosholt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rosholt at 42.0% compared to 30.0% in Greenbelt.
- The poverty level is identical in both Rosholt and Greenbelt at 9%.
- Greenbelt has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.5% in Rosholt.
Demographics
Demographics Rosholt vs Greenbelt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rosholt | Greenbelt |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 48 |
White | 94 | 17 |
Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
Hispanic | 3 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rosholt vs Greenbelt
- In Greenbelt, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 48% compared to 0% in Rosholt.
- Rosholt has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 17% in Greenbelt.
- In Greenbelt, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Rosholt.
- Greenbelt has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 3% in Rosholt.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Greenbelt at 6%, compared to 3% in Rosholt.
- In Greenbelt, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Rosholt.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rosholt | Greenbelt |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 12.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 8.1% |
Depression | 23.2% | 13.0% |
Smoking | 14.0% | 9.8% |
Binge Drinking | 24.6% | 12.3% |
Obesity | 31.4% | 36.0% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rosholt vs Greenbelt
- More residents in Rosholt report poor mental health at 14.1% compared to 12.9% in Greenbelt.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rosholt at 23.2% compared to 13.0% in Greenbelt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rosholt at 14.0% compared to 9.8% in Greenbelt.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rosholt at 24.6% compared to 12.3% in Greenbelt.
- Greenbelt has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 31.4% in Rosholt.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rosholt at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Greenbelt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rosholt | Greenbelt |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.2% (530) |
High School Diploma | 28.3% (133) | 9.0% (2,195) |
Less than High School | 15.3% (72) | 11.4% (2,766) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (41) | 32.2% (7,832) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rosholt vs Greenbelt
- In Greenbelt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Rosholt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosholt hold a high school diploma at 28.3% compared to 9.0% in Greenbelt.
- More residents in Rosholt have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 11.4% in Greenbelt.
- In Greenbelt, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.2% compared to 8.7% in Rosholt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.