Demographics details for Rosholt, WI vs Catawba, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rosholt, WI vs Catawba, SC.
Data | Rosholt | Catawba |
---|---|---|
Population | 470 | 1,439 |
Median Age | 43.9 years | 32.7 years |
Median Income | $55,313 | $50,920 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rosholt vs Catawba
- The population in Catawba is higher at 1,439, compared to 470 in Rosholt.
- Residents in Rosholt have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 32.7 years in Catawba.
- Rosholt has a higher median income of $55,313 compared to $50,920 in Catawba.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rosholt at 42.0% compared to 33.0% in Catawba.
- The poverty level is higher in Catawba at 12%, compared to 9% in Rosholt.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Rosholt and Catawba at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Rosholt vs Catawba provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rosholt | Catawba |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 23 |
White | 94 | 63 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rosholt vs Catawba
- In Catawba, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 0% in Rosholt.
- Rosholt has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 63% in Catawba.
- In Catawba, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Rosholt.
- Catawba has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Rosholt.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Catawba at 4%, compared to 3% in Rosholt.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rosholt and Catawba at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rosholt | Catawba |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 17.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 11.6% |
Depression | 23.2% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 24.6% | 18.3% |
Obesity | 31.4% | 34.8% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rosholt vs Catawba
- In Catawba, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.1% in Rosholt.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rosholt at 23.2% compared to 22.2% in Catawba.
- Catawba has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Rosholt.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rosholt at 24.6% compared to 18.3% in Catawba.
- Catawba has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 31.4% in Rosholt.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rosholt at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Catawba.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rosholt | Catawba |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (1) |
High School Diploma | 28.3% (133) | 11.5% (166) |
Less than High School | 15.3% (72) | 15.7% (226) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (41) | 21.5% (310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rosholt vs Catawba
- In Catawba, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Rosholt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosholt hold a high school diploma at 28.3% compared to 11.5% in Catawba.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Catawba at 15.7%, compared to 15.3% in Rosholt.
- In Catawba, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 8.7% in Rosholt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.