Demographics details for Roseville, MI vs Ute, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roseville, MI vs Ute, IA.
Data | Roseville | Ute |
---|---|---|
Population | 46,812 | 329 |
Median Age | 40.7 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $57,274 | $51,250 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Roseville vs Ute
- In Roseville, the population is higher at 46,812, compared to 329 in Ute.
- Residents in Roseville have a higher median age of 40.7 years compared to 39.5 years in Ute.
- Roseville has a higher median income of $57,274 compared to $51,250 in Ute.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Roseville at 32.0% compared to 27.0% in Ute.
- Roseville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Ute.
- The unemployment rate in Roseville is higher at 6.3%, compared to 2.2% in Ute.
Demographics
Demographics Roseville vs Ute provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Roseville | Ute |
---|---|---|
Black | 23 | Data is updating |
White | 67 | 99 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Roseville vs Ute
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Roseville at 23% compared to 0% in Ute.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ute at 99% compared to 67% in Roseville.
- The Asian population is larger in Roseville at 1% compared to 0% in Ute.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Roseville at 4% compared to 1% in Ute.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Roseville at 5% compared to 0% in Ute.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Roseville and Ute at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Roseville | Ute |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.1% |
Depression | 26.9% | 19.9% |
Smoking | 23.6% | 18.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 21.4% |
Obesity | 40.3% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roseville vs Ute
- More residents in Roseville report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.3% in Ute.
- Depression is more prevalent in Roseville at 26.9% compared to 19.9% in Ute.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Roseville at 23.6% compared to 18.5% in Ute.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ute at 21.4% compared to 17.4% in Roseville.
- Ute has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 40.3% in Roseville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ute at 24.0% compared to 19.0% in Roseville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Roseville | Ute |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (563) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 21.9% (10,268) | 31.0% (102) |
Less than High School | 14.8% (6,925) | 8.5% (28) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (4,839) | 7.0% (23) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roseville vs Ute
- A higher percentage of residents in Roseville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Ute.
- In Ute, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.0% compared to 21.9% in Roseville.
- More residents in Roseville have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 8.5% in Ute.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roseville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 7.0% in Ute.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.