Demographics details for Roseville, MI vs Scott city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Roseville, MI vs Scott city, KS.

Data Roseville Scott city
Population 46,812 4,008
Median Age 40.7 years 36.0 years
Median Income $57,274 $47,217
Married Families 32.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 6.3 4.0

Population Comparison: Roseville vs Scott city

  • In Roseville, the population is higher at 46,812, compared to 4,008 in Scott city.
  • Residents in Roseville have a higher median age of 40.7 years compared to 36.0 years in Scott city.
  • Roseville has a higher median income of $57,274 compared to $47,217 in Scott city.
  • In Scott city, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 32.0% in Roseville.
  • Roseville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Scott city.
  • The unemployment rate in Roseville is higher at 6.3%, compared to 4.0% in Scott city.

Demographics

Demographics Roseville vs Scott city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Roseville Scott city
Black 23 Data is updating
White 67 69
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 4 25
Two or More Races 5 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Roseville vs Scott city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Roseville at 23% compared to 0% in Scott city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Scott city at 69% compared to 67% in Roseville.
  • Both Roseville and Scott city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Scott city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 4% in Roseville.
  • Both Roseville and Scott city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Roseville and Scott city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Roseville Scott city
Mental Health Not Good 19.7% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 10.3%
Depression 26.9% 19.7%
Smoking 23.6% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 17.4% 19.2%
Obesity 40.3% 38.1%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Roseville vs Scott city

  • More residents in Roseville report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 15.6% in Scott city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Roseville at 26.9% compared to 19.7% in Scott city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Roseville at 23.6% compared to 17.6% in Scott city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Scott city at 19.2% compared to 17.4% in Roseville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Roseville at 40.3% compared to 38.1% in Scott city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Roseville at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Scott city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Roseville Scott city
No Schooling 1.2% (563) 2.9% (116)
High School Diploma 21.9% (10,268) 13.5% (543)
Less than High School 14.8% (6,925) 24.2% (968)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.3% (4,839) 12.2% (490)

Education Levels Comparison: Roseville vs Scott city

  • In Scott city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 1.2% in Roseville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Roseville hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 13.5% in Scott city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Scott city at 24.2%, compared to 14.8% in Roseville.
  • In Scott city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 10.3% in Roseville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.