Demographics details for Roseville, MI vs Fort valley, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roseville, MI vs Fort valley, GA.
| Data | Roseville | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,812 | 8,838 |
| Median Age | 40.7 years | 30.6 years |
| Median Income | $57,274 | $31,807 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 18.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Roseville vs Fort valley
- In Roseville, the population is higher at 46,812, compared to 8,838 in Fort valley.
- Residents in Roseville have a higher median age of 40.7 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
- Roseville has a higher median income of $57,274 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Roseville at 32.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 12% in Roseville.
- The unemployment rate in Roseville is higher at 6.3%, compared to 4.5% in Fort valley.
Demographics
Demographics Roseville vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Roseville | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 70 |
| White | 67 | 18 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Roseville vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 23% in Roseville.
- Roseville has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Roseville at 1% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 4% in Roseville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Roseville at 5% compared to 4% in Fort valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Roseville and Fort valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Roseville | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 26.9% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 23.6% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 46.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roseville vs Fort valley
- More residents in Roseville report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 19.2% in Fort valley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Roseville at 26.9% compared to 19.5% in Fort valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Roseville at 23.6% compared to 22.3% in Fort valley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Roseville at 17.4% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 40.3% in Roseville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Roseville at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Fort valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Roseville | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (563) | 3.0% (267) |
| High School Diploma | 21.9% (10,268) | 13.9% (1,226) |
| Less than High School | 14.8% (6,925) | 17.3% (1,527) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (4,839) | 10.8% (954) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roseville vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.2% in Roseville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roseville hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort valley at 17.3%, compared to 14.8% in Roseville.
- In Fort valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.8% compared to 10.3% in Roseville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.