Demographics details for Roseville, MI vs Fairhope, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roseville, MI vs Fairhope, AL.
| Data | Roseville | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,812 | 23,859 |
| Median Age | 40.7 years | 44.9 years |
| Median Income | $57,274 | $85,456 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Roseville vs Fairhope
- In Roseville, the population is higher at 46,812, compared to 23,859 in Fairhope.
- The median age in Fairhope is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 40.7 years in Roseville.
- Fairhope has a higher median income of $85,456, compared to $57,274 in Roseville.
- In Fairhope, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 32.0% in Roseville.
- Roseville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Fairhope.
- The unemployment rate in Roseville is higher at 6.3%, compared to 3.4% in Fairhope.
Demographics
Demographics Roseville vs Fairhope provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Roseville | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 4 |
| White | 67 | 89 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Roseville vs Fairhope
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Roseville at 23% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairhope at 89% compared to 67% in Roseville.
- Both Roseville and Fairhope have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Roseville and Fairhope at 4%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Roseville at 5% compared to 2% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Roseville and Fairhope at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Roseville | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 26.9% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 23.6% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 34.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roseville vs Fairhope
- More residents in Roseville report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 15.8% in Fairhope.
- Depression is more prevalent in Roseville at 26.9% compared to 22.6% in Fairhope.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Roseville at 23.6% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairhope at 18.4% compared to 17.4% in Roseville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Roseville at 40.3% compared to 34.7% in Fairhope.
- Disability percentages are higher in Roseville at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Roseville | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (563) | 0.3% (75) |
| High School Diploma | 21.9% (10,268) | 7.1% (1,686) |
| Less than High School | 14.8% (6,925) | 4.6% (1,098) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (4,839) | 35.8% (8,552) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roseville vs Fairhope
- A higher percentage of residents in Roseville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Fairhope.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roseville hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 7.1% in Fairhope.
- More residents in Roseville have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 4.6% in Fairhope.
- In Fairhope, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 10.3% in Roseville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.