Demographics details for Roseville, CA vs Marshall, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roseville, CA vs Marshall, MI.
| Data | Roseville | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 154,817 | 6,753 |
| Median Age | 39.8 years | 45.4 years |
| Median Income | $112,265 | $72,813 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Roseville vs Marshall
- In Roseville, the population is higher at 154,817, compared to 6,753 in Marshall.
- The median age in Marshall is higher at 45.4 years, compared to 39.8 years in Roseville.
- Roseville has a higher median income of $112,265 compared to $72,813 in Marshall.
- In Marshall, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 42.0% in Roseville.
- The poverty level is higher in Marshall at 9%, compared to 8% in Roseville.
- Marshall has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Roseville.
Demographics
Demographics Roseville vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Roseville | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 61 | 94 |
| Asian | 12 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Roseville vs Marshall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Roseville at 2% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Marshall at 94% compared to 61% in Roseville.
- The Asian population is larger in Roseville at 12% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Roseville at 15% compared to 4% in Marshall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Roseville at 10% compared to 2% in Marshall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Roseville and Marshall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Roseville | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 10.5% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 26.4% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roseville vs Marshall
- In Marshall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.3% in Roseville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Marshall at 25.2% versus 19.2% in Roseville.
- Marshall has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 10.5% in Roseville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Roseville at 18.1% compared to 18.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 26.4% in Roseville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Marshall at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Roseville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Roseville | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (1,136) | 0.7% (46) |
| High School Diploma | 9.2% (14,170) | 15.8% (1,067) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (8,299) | 7.3% (493) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.7% (45,932) | 33.1% (2,233) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roseville vs Marshall
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Roseville and Marshall at 0.7%.
- In Marshall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 9.2% in Roseville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Marshall at 7.3%, compared to 5.4% in Roseville.
- In Marshall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 29.7% in Roseville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.