Demographics details for Roseville, CA vs Earlham, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roseville, CA vs Earlham, IA.
| Data | Roseville | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 154,817 | 1,423 |
| Median Age | 39.8 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $112,265 | $103,977 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Roseville vs Earlham
- In Roseville, the population is higher at 154,817, compared to 1,423 in Earlham.
- The median age in Earlham is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 39.8 years in Roseville.
- Roseville has a higher median income of $112,265 compared to $103,977 in Earlham.
- In Earlham, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 42.0% in Roseville.
- Roseville has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Earlham.
- The unemployment rate in Roseville is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.2% in Earlham.
Demographics
Demographics Roseville vs Earlham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Roseville | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 61 | 95 |
| Asian | 12 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Roseville vs Earlham
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Roseville and Earlham at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Earlham at 95% compared to 61% in Roseville.
- The Asian population is larger in Roseville at 12% compared to 0% in Earlham.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Roseville at 15% compared to 1% in Earlham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Roseville at 10% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Roseville and Earlham at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Roseville | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 18.4% |
| Smoking | 10.5% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 23.0% |
| Obesity | 26.4% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roseville vs Earlham
- More residents in Roseville report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 14.4% in Earlham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Roseville at 19.2% compared to 18.4% in Earlham.
- Earlham has a higher smoking rate at 14.6% compared to 10.5% in Roseville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 18.1% in Roseville.
- Earlham has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 26.4% in Roseville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Roseville and Earlham at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Roseville | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (1,136) | 0.7% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 9.2% (14,170) | 13.8% (197) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (8,299) | 6.0% (85) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.7% (45,932) | 17.0% (242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roseville vs Earlham
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Roseville and Earlham at 0.7%.
- In Earlham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.8% compared to 9.2% in Roseville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Earlham at 6.0%, compared to 5.4% in Roseville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roseville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.7% compared to 17.0% in Earlham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.