Demographics details for Rosendale, WI vs Griffin, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rosendale, WI vs Griffin, GA.
| Data | Rosendale | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,035 | 23,693 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $86,364 | $42,047 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Rosendale vs Griffin
- The population in Griffin is higher at 23,693, compared to 1,035 in Rosendale.
- Residents in Rosendale have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
- Rosendale has a higher median income of $86,364 compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rosendale at 50.0% compared to 26.0% in Griffin.
- The poverty level is higher in Griffin at 15%, compared to 6% in Rosendale.
- Griffin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Rosendale.
Demographics
Demographics Rosendale vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rosendale | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 52 |
| White | 92 | 36 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rosendale vs Griffin
- In Griffin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 1% in Rosendale.
- Rosendale has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 36% in Griffin.
- In Griffin, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Rosendale.
- Griffin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Rosendale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Griffin at 5%, compared to 4% in Rosendale.
- In Griffin, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Rosendale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rosendale | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.6% | 13.4% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rosendale vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 14.6% in Rosendale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rosendale at 23.1% compared to 19.7% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 14.8% in Rosendale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rosendale at 24.6% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rosendale at 39.0% compared to 38.8% in Griffin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Griffin at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Rosendale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rosendale | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.2% (517) |
| High School Diploma | 24.6% (255) | 22.6% (5,347) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (76) | 16.3% (3,859) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (166) | 11.9% (2,819) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rosendale vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Rosendale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosendale hold a high school diploma at 24.6% compared to 22.6% in Griffin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Griffin at 16.3%, compared to 7.3% in Rosendale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosendale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 11.9% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.