Demographics details for Rosemount, MN vs Woodburn, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rosemount, MN vs Woodburn, OR.
| Data | Rosemount | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,081 | 27,290 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 39.2 years |
| Median Income | $127,252 | $58,916 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Rosemount vs Woodburn
- The population in Woodburn is higher at 27,290, compared to 27,081 in Rosemount.
- The median age in Woodburn is higher at 39.2 years, compared to 37.8 years in Rosemount.
- Rosemount has a higher median income of $127,252 compared to $58,916 in Woodburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rosemount at 47.0% compared to 35.0% in Woodburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodburn at 12%, compared to 4% in Rosemount.
- Woodburn has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.6% in Rosemount.
Demographics
Demographics Rosemount vs Woodburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rosemount | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 85 | 22 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 59 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rosemount vs Woodburn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rosemount at 3% compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- Rosemount has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 22% in Woodburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Rosemount at 4% compared to 1% in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 59%, compared to 3% in Rosemount.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodburn at 17%, compared to 5% in Rosemount.
- In Woodburn, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Rosemount.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rosemount | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.6% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 12.2% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rosemount vs Woodburn
- In Woodburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 12.6% in Rosemount.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodburn at 27.1% versus 21.8% in Rosemount.
- Woodburn has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 12.2% in Rosemount.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rosemount at 18.6% compared to 14.4% in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 30.6% in Rosemount.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodburn at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Rosemount.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rosemount | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (99) | 3.6% (992) |
| High School Diploma | 8.9% (2,413) | 13.3% (3,628) |
| Less than High School | 2.5% (683) | 38.2% (10,414) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (8,617) | 9.4% (2,578) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rosemount vs Woodburn
- In Woodburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.4% in Rosemount.
- In Woodburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.3% compared to 8.9% in Rosemount.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodburn at 38.2%, compared to 2.5% in Rosemount.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosemount hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 9.4% in Woodburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.