Demographics details for Rosemount, MN vs Lexington, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rosemount, MN vs Lexington, KY.
Data | Rosemount | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,081 | 320,347 |
Median Age | 37.8 years | 35.2 years |
Median Income | $127,252 | $66,087 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Rosemount vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 320,347, compared to 27,081 in Rosemount.
- Residents in Rosemount have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 35.2 years in Lexington.
- Rosemount has a higher median income of $127,252 compared to $66,087 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rosemount at 47.0% compared to 36.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 4% in Rosemount.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Rosemount.
Demographics
Demographics Rosemount vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rosemount | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 15 |
White | 85 | 68 |
Asian | 4 | 4 |
Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rosemount vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 3% in Rosemount.
- Rosemount has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 68% in Lexington.
- Both Rosemount and Lexington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Rosemount.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 6%, compared to 5% in Rosemount.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rosemount and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rosemount | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.6% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 12.0% |
Depression | 21.8% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 12.2% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 30.6% | 36.0% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rosemount vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 12.6% in Rosemount.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 24.0% versus 21.8% in Rosemount.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 12.2% in Rosemount.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rosemount at 18.6% compared to 15.9% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 30.6% in Rosemount.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Rosemount.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rosemount | Lexington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (99) | 0.6% (2,032) |
High School Diploma | 8.9% (2,413) | 9.9% (31,844) |
Less than High School | 2.5% (683) | 8.7% (27,787) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (8,617) | 30.4% (97,540) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rosemount vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Rosemount.
- In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.9% compared to 8.9% in Rosemount.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 8.7%, compared to 2.5% in Rosemount.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosemount hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 30.4% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.