Demographics details for Rosemount, MN vs Gilford, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rosemount, MN vs Gilford, NH.
| Data | Rosemount | Gilford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,081 | 7,194 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 47.5 years |
| Median Income | $127,252 | $75,964 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 0.6% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Rosemount vs Gilford
- In Rosemount, the population is higher at 27,081, compared to 7,194 in Gilford.
- The median age in Gilford is higher at 47.5 years, compared to 37.8 years in Rosemount.
- Rosemount has a higher median income of $127,252 compared to $75,964 in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rosemount at 47.0% compared to 0.6% in Gilford.
- The poverty level is higher in Gilford at 6%, compared to 4% in Rosemount.
- The unemployment rate in Rosemount is higher at 3.6%, compared to 2.2% in Gilford.
Demographics
Demographics Rosemount vs Gilford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rosemount | Gilford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 0.5 |
| White | 85 | 96.2 |
| Asian | 4 | 0.7 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 1.6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1.0 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rosemount vs Gilford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rosemount at 3% compared to 0.5% in Gilford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gilford at 96.2% compared to 85% in Rosemount.
- The Asian population is larger in Rosemount at 4% compared to 0.7% in Gilford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rosemount at 3% compared to 1.6% in Gilford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rosemount at 5% compared to 1.0% in Gilford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rosemount and Gilford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rosemount | Gilford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.6% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 21.8% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 12.2% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rosemount vs Gilford
- More residents in Rosemount report poor mental health at 12.6% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rosemount at 21.8% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rosemount at 12.2% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rosemount at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rosemount at 30.6% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rosemount at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rosemount | Gilford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (99) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 8.9% (2,413) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 2.5% (683) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (8,617) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rosemount vs Gilford
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosemount have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosemount hold a high school diploma at 8.9% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- More residents in Rosemount have less than a high school education at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosemount hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.