Demographics details for Rosemount, MN vs Covina, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rosemount, MN vs Covina, CA.
| Data | Rosemount | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,081 | 49,489 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $127,252 | $89,650 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Rosemount vs Covina
- The population in Covina is higher at 49,489, compared to 27,081 in Rosemount.
- Residents in Rosemount have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 37.6 years in Covina.
- Rosemount has a higher median income of $127,252 compared to $89,650 in Covina.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rosemount at 47.0% compared to 38.0% in Covina.
- The poverty level is higher in Covina at 12%, compared to 4% in Rosemount.
- Covina has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 3.6% in Rosemount.
Demographics
Demographics Rosemount vs Covina provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rosemount | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 85 | 18 |
| Asian | 4 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 63 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rosemount vs Covina
- In Covina, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Rosemount.
- Rosemount has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 18% in Covina.
- In Covina, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 4% in Rosemount.
- Covina has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 63%, compared to 3% in Rosemount.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Covina at 19%, compared to 5% in Rosemount.
- In Covina, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Rosemount.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rosemount | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.6% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 15.9% |
| Smoking | 12.2% | 10.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rosemount vs Covina
- In Covina, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 12.6% in Rosemount.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rosemount at 21.8% compared to 15.9% in Covina.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rosemount at 12.2% compared to 10.5% in Covina.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rosemount at 18.6% compared to 15.6% in Covina.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rosemount at 30.6% compared to 28.2% in Covina.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Covina at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Rosemount.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rosemount | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (99) | 1.5% (753) |
| High School Diploma | 8.9% (2,413) | 17.4% (8,620) |
| Less than High School | 2.5% (683) | 17.2% (8,533) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (8,617) | 18.7% (9,254) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rosemount vs Covina
- In Covina, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.4% in Rosemount.
- In Covina, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.4% compared to 8.9% in Rosemount.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Covina at 17.2%, compared to 2.5% in Rosemount.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosemount hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 18.7% in Covina.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.