Demographics details for Rosedale, MD vs Villas, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rosedale, MD vs Villas, NJ.
| Data | Rosedale | Villas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,058 | 9,925 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $81,297 | $74,182 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Rosedale vs Villas
- In Rosedale, the population is higher at 20,058, compared to 9,925 in Villas.
- The median age in Villas is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 40.9 years in Rosedale.
- Rosedale has a higher median income of $81,297 compared to $74,182 in Villas.
- In Villas, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 37.0% in Rosedale.
- Rosedale has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Villas.
- The unemployment rate in Rosedale is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Villas.
Demographics
Demographics Rosedale vs Villas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rosedale | Villas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 41 | 1 |
| White | 38 | 88 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rosedale vs Villas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rosedale at 41% compared to 1% in Villas.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Villas at 88% compared to 38% in Rosedale.
- The Asian population is larger in Rosedale at 6% compared to 1% in Villas.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rosedale at 8% compared to 6% in Villas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rosedale at 7% compared to 6% in Villas.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rosedale and Villas at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rosedale | Villas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rosedale vs Villas
- In Villas, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.4% in Rosedale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Villas at 25.1% versus 22.2% in Rosedale.
- Villas has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 14.6% in Rosedale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Villas at 18.9% compared to 15.2% in Rosedale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rosedale at 38.2% compared to 34.4% in Villas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Villas at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Rosedale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rosedale | Villas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (262) | 0.9% (89) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (3,973) | 24.7% (2,455) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (2,371) | 9.5% (946) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (3,271) | 17.4% (1,724) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rosedale vs Villas
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosedale have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.9% in Villas.
- In Villas, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.7% compared to 19.8% in Rosedale.
- More residents in Rosedale have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 9.5% in Villas.
- In Villas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 16.3% in Rosedale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.