Demographics details for Roseburg, OR vs Graceville, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Roseburg, OR vs Graceville, FL.
| Data | Roseburg | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,853 | 2,175 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $50,297 | $36,625 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Roseburg vs Graceville
- In Roseburg, the population is higher at 23,853, compared to 2,175 in Graceville.
- Residents in Roseburg have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Roseburg has a higher median income of $50,297 compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
- In Graceville, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 33.0% in Roseburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Graceville at 18%, compared to 13% in Roseburg.
- The unemployment rate in Roseburg is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Graceville.
Demographics
Demographics Roseburg vs Graceville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Roseburg | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 32 |
| White | 84 | 59 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Roseburg vs Graceville
- In Graceville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 0% in Roseburg.
- Roseburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 59% in Graceville.
- Both Roseburg and Graceville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Roseburg and Graceville at 6%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Roseburg at 8% compared to 2% in Graceville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Roseburg at 1% compared to 0% in Graceville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Roseburg | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 24.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 33.3% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Roseburg vs Graceville
- More residents in Roseburg report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 18.6% in Graceville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Roseburg at 26.3% compared to 22.2% in Graceville.
- Graceville has a higher smoking rate at 24.4% compared to 16.7% in Roseburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Roseburg at 16.3% compared to 15.8% in Graceville.
- Graceville has higher obesity rates at 33.6% compared to 33.3% in Roseburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Roseburg at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Graceville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Roseburg | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (121) | 2.7% (58) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (4,195) | 25.3% (550) |
| Less than High School | 9.8% (2,342) | 22.5% (490) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (3,776) | 15.2% (331) |
Education Levels Comparison: Roseburg vs Graceville
- In Graceville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.5% in Roseburg.
- In Graceville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 17.6% in Roseburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Graceville at 22.5%, compared to 9.8% in Roseburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Roseburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 15.2% in Graceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.