Demographics details for Ronceverte, WV vs Laurel, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ronceverte, WV vs Laurel, MS.
| Data | Ronceverte | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,554 | 17,066 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $40,605 | $36,336 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Ronceverte vs Laurel
- The population in Laurel is higher at 17,066, compared to 1,554 in Ronceverte.
- Residents in Ronceverte have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 37.6 years in Laurel.
- Ronceverte has a higher median income of $40,605 compared to $36,336 in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 28.0% in Ronceverte.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurel at 20%, compared to 17% in Ronceverte.
- Laurel has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.5% in Ronceverte.
Demographics
Demographics Ronceverte vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ronceverte | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 66 |
| White | 91 | 28 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ronceverte vs Laurel
- In Laurel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 4% in Ronceverte.
- Ronceverte has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 28% in Laurel.
- Both Ronceverte and Laurel have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Laurel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Ronceverte.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ronceverte at 3% compared to 1% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ronceverte.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ronceverte | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 29.2% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 24.4% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 11.6% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ronceverte vs Laurel
- More residents in Ronceverte report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 17.9% in Laurel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ronceverte at 29.2% compared to 21.8% in Laurel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ronceverte at 24.4% compared to 23.1% in Laurel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ronceverte at 13.5% compared to 11.6% in Laurel.
- Laurel has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 40.6% in Ronceverte.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurel at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Ronceverte.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ronceverte | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (124) |
| High School Diploma | 18.5% (287) | 17.3% (2,956) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (236) | 17.5% (2,979) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (183) | 14.6% (2,485) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ronceverte vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Ronceverte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ronceverte hold a high school diploma at 18.5% compared to 17.3% in Laurel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurel at 17.5%, compared to 15.2% in Ronceverte.
- In Laurel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 11.8% in Ronceverte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.