Demographics details for Rogue river, OR vs Stoughton, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rogue river, OR vs Stoughton, WI.
Data | Rogue river | Stoughton |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,380 | 12,846 |
Median Age | 52.6 years | 41.6 years |
Median Income | $43,929 | $73,014 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rogue river vs Stoughton
- The population in Stoughton is higher at 12,846, compared to 2,380 in Rogue river.
- Residents in Rogue river have a higher median age of 52.6 years compared to 41.6 years in Stoughton.
- Stoughton has a higher median income of $73,014, compared to $43,929 in Rogue river.
- In Stoughton, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 32.0% in Rogue river.
- Rogue river has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Stoughton.
- The unemployment rate in Rogue river is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Stoughton.
Demographics
Demographics Rogue river vs Stoughton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rogue river | Stoughton |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 85 | 93 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rogue river vs Stoughton
- In Stoughton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Rogue river.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stoughton at 93% compared to 85% in Rogue river.
- The Asian population is larger in Rogue river at 1% compared to 0% in Stoughton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rogue river at 5% compared to 3% in Stoughton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rogue river at 8% compared to 3% in Stoughton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rogue river at 1% compared to 0% in Stoughton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rogue river | Stoughton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 8.7% |
Depression | 29.2% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 15.3% | 13.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 24.5% |
Obesity | 29.6% | 28.8% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rogue river vs Stoughton
- More residents in Rogue river report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 14.4% in Stoughton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rogue river at 29.2% compared to 24.8% in Stoughton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rogue river at 15.3% compared to 13.8% in Stoughton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stoughton at 24.5% compared to 16.9% in Rogue river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rogue river at 29.6% compared to 28.8% in Stoughton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rogue river at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Stoughton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rogue river | Stoughton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (17) | 0.4% (51) |
High School Diploma | 16.5% (392) | 14.4% (1,850) |
Less than High School | 12.7% (302) | 7.6% (981) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (240) | 25.2% (3,241) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rogue river vs Stoughton
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogue river have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Stoughton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogue river hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 14.4% in Stoughton.
- More residents in Rogue river have less than a high school education at 12.7% compared to 7.6% in Stoughton.
- In Stoughton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.2% compared to 10.1% in Rogue river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.