Demographics details for Rogue river, OR vs High point, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rogue river, OR vs High point, NC.
Data | Rogue river | High point |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,380 | 115,067 |
Median Age | 52.6 years | 37.7 years |
Median Income | $43,929 | $58,582 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Rogue river vs High point
- The population in High point is higher at 115,067, compared to 2,380 in Rogue river.
- Residents in Rogue river have a higher median age of 52.6 years compared to 37.7 years in High point.
- High point has a higher median income of $58,582, compared to $43,929 in Rogue river.
- In High point, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 32.0% in Rogue river.
- The poverty level is higher in High point at 15%, compared to 11% in Rogue river.
- High point has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 4.5% in Rogue river.
Demographics
Demographics Rogue river vs High point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rogue river | High point |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 32 |
White | 85 | 42 |
Asian | 1 | 8 |
Hispanic | 5 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rogue river vs High point
- In High point, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 0% in Rogue river.
- Rogue river has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 42% in High point.
- In High point, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Rogue river.
- High point has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 5% in Rogue river.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rogue river at 8% compared to 7% in High point.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rogue river at 1% compared to 0% in High point.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rogue river | High point |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 16.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 12.1% |
Depression | 29.2% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 15.3% | 17.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 15.5% |
Obesity | 29.6% | 36.1% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rogue river vs High point
- More residents in Rogue river report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 16.4% in High point.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rogue river at 29.2% compared to 23.0% in High point.
- High point has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 15.3% in Rogue river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rogue river at 16.9% compared to 15.5% in High point.
- High point has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 29.6% in Rogue river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rogue river at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in High point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rogue river | High point |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (17) | 1.4% (1,587) |
High School Diploma | 16.5% (392) | 13.5% (15,564) |
Less than High School | 12.7% (302) | 12.8% (14,768) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (240) | 22.3% (25,678) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rogue river vs High point
- In High point, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Rogue river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogue river hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 13.5% in High point.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in High point at 12.8%, compared to 12.7% in Rogue river.
- In High point, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 10.1% in Rogue river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.