Demographics details for Rogue river, OR vs Anderson, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rogue river, OR vs Anderson, SC.
| Data | Rogue river | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,380 | 29,771 |
| Median Age | 52.6 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $43,929 | $40,445 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Rogue river vs Anderson
- The population in Anderson is higher at 29,771, compared to 2,380 in Rogue river.
- Residents in Rogue river have a higher median age of 52.6 years compared to 32.7 years in Anderson.
- Rogue river has a higher median income of $43,929 compared to $40,445 in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rogue river at 32.0% compared to 28.0% in Anderson.
- The poverty level is higher in Anderson at 14%, compared to 11% in Rogue river.
- Anderson has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.5% in Rogue river.
Demographics
Demographics Rogue river vs Anderson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rogue river | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 28 |
| White | 85 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rogue river vs Anderson
- In Anderson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 0% in Rogue river.
- Rogue river has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 61% in Anderson.
- In Anderson, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Rogue river.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rogue river at 5% compared to 4% in Anderson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rogue river at 8% compared to 5% in Anderson.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rogue river at 1% compared to 0% in Anderson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rogue river | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 29.2% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 29.6% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rogue river vs Anderson
- In Anderson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.8% in Rogue river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rogue river at 29.2% compared to 22.6% in Anderson.
- Anderson has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 15.3% in Rogue river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rogue river at 16.9% compared to 15.7% in Anderson.
- Anderson has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 29.6% in Rogue river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rogue river at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Anderson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rogue river | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (17) | 0.8% (234) |
| High School Diploma | 16.5% (392) | 15.2% (4,532) |
| Less than High School | 12.7% (302) | 11.9% (3,538) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (240) | 15.8% (4,718) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rogue river vs Anderson
- In Anderson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Rogue river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogue river hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 15.2% in Anderson.
- More residents in Rogue river have less than a high school education at 12.7% compared to 11.9% in Anderson.
- In Anderson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 10.1% in Rogue river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.