Demographics details for Rogersville, MO vs Earl park, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rogersville, MO vs Earl park, IN.

Data Rogersville Earl park
Population 4,884 362
Median Age 29.0 years 50.6 years
Median Income $50,579 $62,750
Married Families 34.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 8% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Rogersville vs Earl park

  • In Rogersville, the population is higher at 4,884, compared to 362 in Earl park.
  • The median age in Earl park is higher at 50.6 years, compared to 29.0 years in Rogersville.
  • Earl park has a higher median income of $62,750, compared to $50,579 in Rogersville.
  • In Earl park, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Rogersville.
  • Rogersville has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Earl park.
  • The unemployment rate in Rogersville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Earl park.

Demographics

Demographics Rogersville vs Earl park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rogersville Earl park
Black Data is updating 1
White 97 89
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 4
Two or More Races 3 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Rogersville vs Earl park

  • In Earl park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Rogersville.
  • Rogersville has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 89% in Earl park.
  • Both Rogersville and Earl park have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Earl park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Rogersville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Earl park at 6%, compared to 3% in Rogersville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rogersville and Earl park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rogersville Earl park
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 13.8%
Depression 25.8% 28.0%
Smoking 18.9% 24.6%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 16.9%
Obesity 34.5% 41.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rogersville vs Earl park

  • In Earl park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.7% in Rogersville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Earl park at 28.0% versus 25.8% in Rogersville.
  • Earl park has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 18.9% in Rogersville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Rogersville at 17.9% compared to 16.9% in Earl park.
  • Earl park has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 34.5% in Rogersville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Earl park at 21.0% compared to 9.0% in Rogersville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rogersville Earl park
No Schooling 0.4% (20) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 11.2% (549) 21.5% (78)
Less than High School 7.7% (374) 11.6% (42)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.1% (884) 8.8% (32)

Education Levels Comparison: Rogersville vs Earl park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Rogersville have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Earl park.
  • In Earl park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 11.2% in Rogersville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Earl park at 11.6%, compared to 7.7% in Rogersville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rogersville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 8.8% in Earl park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.