Demographics details for Rogers, MN vs Richland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rogers, MN vs Richland, MS.
| Data | Rogers | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,500 | 7,297 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $154,611 | $54,753 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Rogers vs Richland
- In Rogers, the population is higher at 13,500, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
- Residents in Rogers have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 37.1 years in Richland.
- Rogers has a higher median income of $154,611 compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rogers at 48.0% compared to 40.0% in Richland.
- The poverty level is higher in Richland at 12%, compared to 5% in Rogers.
- Richland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Rogers.
Demographics
Demographics Rogers vs Richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rogers | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 19 |
| White | 94 | 74 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rogers vs Richland
- In Richland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 1% in Rogers.
- Rogers has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 74% in Richland.
- In Richland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Rogers.
- Richland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Rogers.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rogers at 3% compared to 2% in Richland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rogers and Richland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rogers | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.8% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.7% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 25.5% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rogers vs Richland
- In Richland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 13.2% in Rogers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rogers at 23.7% compared to 23.4% in Richland.
- Richland has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 11.3% in Rogers.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rogers at 22.7% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Richland has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 25.5% in Rogers.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richland at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Rogers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rogers | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.7% (122) |
| High School Diploma | 10.5% (1,424) | 12.6% (916) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (449) | 10.0% (732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.2% (4,344) | 16.1% (1,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rogers vs Richland
- In Richland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Rogers.
- In Richland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 10.5% in Rogers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richland at 10.0%, compared to 3.3% in Rogers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.2% compared to 16.1% in Richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.