Demographics details for Rogers, AR vs South river, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rogers, AR vs South river, NJ.
| Data | Rogers | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 72,999 | 15,990 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $78,075 | $95,981 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Rogers vs South river
- In Rogers, the population is higher at 72,999, compared to 15,990 in South river.
- The median age in South river is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 33.4 years in Rogers.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981, compared to $78,075 in Rogers.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rogers at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in South river.
- Rogers has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in South river.
- South river has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Rogers.
Demographics
Demographics Rogers vs South river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rogers | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 7 |
| White | 46 | 50 |
| Asian | 3 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 31 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rogers vs South river
- In South river, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 1% in Rogers.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South river at 50% compared to 46% in Rogers.
- In South river, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 3% in Rogers.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rogers at 31% compared to 30% in South river.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rogers at 18% compared to 7% in South river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rogers and South river at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rogers | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rogers vs South river
- More residents in Rogers report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rogers at 23.7% compared to 21.0% in South river.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rogers at 17.6% compared to 14.6% in South river.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South river at 16.0% compared to 15.3% in Rogers.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rogers at 36.7% compared to 31.6% in South river.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South river at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Rogers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rogers | South river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (669) | 2.5% (394) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (11,561) | 18.7% (2,985) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (12,987) | 20.6% (3,292) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.0% (14,571) | 18.9% (3,025) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rogers vs South river
- In South river, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.9% in Rogers.
- In South river, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 15.8% in Rogers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South river at 20.6%, compared to 17.8% in Rogers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 18.9% in South river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.