Demographics details for Rogers, AR vs Graceville, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rogers, AR vs Graceville, FL.
| Data | Rogers | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 72,999 | 2,175 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $78,075 | $36,625 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Rogers vs Graceville
- In Rogers, the population is higher at 72,999, compared to 2,175 in Graceville.
- Residents in Rogers have a higher median age of 33.4 years compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Rogers has a higher median income of $78,075 compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
- In Graceville, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 40.0% in Rogers.
- The poverty level is higher in Graceville at 18%, compared to 9% in Rogers.
- Graceville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.5% in Rogers.
Demographics
Demographics Rogers vs Graceville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rogers | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 32 |
| White | 46 | 59 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 31 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rogers vs Graceville
- In Graceville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 1% in Rogers.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Graceville at 59% compared to 46% in Rogers.
- The Asian population is larger in Rogers at 3% compared to 1% in Graceville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rogers at 31% compared to 6% in Graceville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rogers at 18% compared to 2% in Graceville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rogers at 1% compared to 0% in Graceville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rogers | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 24.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rogers vs Graceville
- In Graceville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.8% in Rogers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rogers at 23.7% compared to 22.2% in Graceville.
- Graceville has a higher smoking rate at 24.4% compared to 17.6% in Rogers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Graceville at 15.8% compared to 15.3% in Rogers.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rogers at 36.7% compared to 33.6% in Graceville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Graceville at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Rogers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rogers | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (669) | 2.7% (58) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (11,561) | 25.3% (550) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (12,987) | 22.5% (490) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.0% (14,571) | 15.2% (331) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rogers vs Graceville
- In Graceville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.9% in Rogers.
- In Graceville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 15.8% in Rogers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Graceville at 22.5%, compared to 17.8% in Rogers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 15.2% in Graceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.