Demographics details for Rogers, AR vs Gilford, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rogers, AR vs Gilford, NH.
Data | Rogers | Gilford |
---|---|---|
Population | 72,999 | 7,194 |
Median Age | 33.4 years | 47.5 years |
Median Income | $78,075 | $75,964 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 0.6% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Rogers vs Gilford
- In Rogers, the population is higher at 72,999, compared to 7,194 in Gilford.
- The median age in Gilford is higher at 47.5 years, compared to 33.4 years in Rogers.
- Rogers has a higher median income of $78,075 compared to $75,964 in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rogers at 40.0% compared to 0.6% in Gilford.
- Rogers has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 6% in Gilford.
- The unemployment rate in Rogers is higher at 2.5%, compared to 2.2% in Gilford.
Demographics
Demographics Rogers vs Gilford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rogers | Gilford |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 0.5 |
White | 46 | 96.2 |
Asian | 3 | 0.7 |
Hispanic | 31 | 1.6 |
Two or More Races | 18 | 1.0 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rogers vs Gilford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rogers at 1% compared to 0.5% in Gilford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gilford at 96.2% compared to 46% in Rogers.
- The Asian population is larger in Rogers at 3% compared to 0.7% in Gilford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rogers at 31% compared to 1.6% in Gilford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rogers at 18% compared to 1.0% in Gilford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rogers at 1% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rogers | Gilford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 23.7% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 17.6% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 15.3% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 36.7% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rogers vs Gilford
- More residents in Rogers report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rogers at 23.7% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rogers at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rogers at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rogers at 36.7% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rogers at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rogers | Gilford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (669) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 15.8% (11,561) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 17.8% (12,987) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.0% (14,571) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rogers vs Gilford
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogers have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogers hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- More residents in Rogers have less than a high school education at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.