Demographics details for Rogers, AR vs Cudahy, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rogers, AR vs Cudahy, WI.
Data | Rogers | Cudahy |
---|---|---|
Population | 72,999 | 17,796 |
Median Age | 33.4 years | 42.4 years |
Median Income | $78,075 | $66,592 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rogers vs Cudahy
- In Rogers, the population is higher at 72,999, compared to 17,796 in Cudahy.
- The median age in Cudahy is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 33.4 years in Rogers.
- Rogers has a higher median income of $78,075 compared to $66,592 in Cudahy.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rogers at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in Cudahy.
- The poverty level is higher in Cudahy at 11%, compared to 9% in Rogers.
- Cudahy has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Rogers.
Demographics
Demographics Rogers vs Cudahy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rogers | Cudahy |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 3 |
White | 46 | 77 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 31 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 18 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rogers vs Cudahy
- In Cudahy, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Rogers.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cudahy at 77% compared to 46% in Rogers.
- The Asian population is larger in Rogers at 3% compared to 2% in Cudahy.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rogers at 31% compared to 9% in Cudahy.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rogers at 18% compared to 9% in Cudahy.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rogers at 1% compared to 0% in Cudahy.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rogers | Cudahy |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 9.6% |
Depression | 23.7% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 26.4% |
Obesity | 36.7% | 34.2% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rogers vs Cudahy
- More residents in Rogers report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.5% in Cudahy.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cudahy at 24.3% versus 23.7% in Rogers.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rogers at 17.6% compared to 16.4% in Cudahy.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 15.3% in Rogers.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rogers at 36.7% compared to 34.2% in Cudahy.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cudahy at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Rogers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rogers | Cudahy |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (669) | 0.9% (166) |
High School Diploma | 15.8% (11,561) | 25.1% (4,460) |
Less than High School | 17.8% (12,987) | 9.9% (1,768) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.0% (14,571) | 21.0% (3,730) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rogers vs Cudahy
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Rogers and Cudahy at 0.9%.
- In Cudahy, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 15.8% in Rogers.
- More residents in Rogers have less than a high school education at 17.8% compared to 9.9% in Cudahy.
- In Cudahy, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 20.0% in Rogers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.