Demographics details for Rogers, AR vs College park, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rogers, AR vs College park, MD.
| Data | Rogers | College park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 72,999 | 34,190 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 21.6 years |
| Median Income | $78,075 | $76,973 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Rogers vs College park
- In Rogers, the population is higher at 72,999, compared to 34,190 in College park.
- Residents in Rogers have a higher median age of 33.4 years compared to 21.6 years in College park.
- Rogers has a higher median income of $78,075 compared to $76,973 in College park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rogers at 40.0% compared to 17.0% in College park.
- The poverty level is higher in College park at 10%, compared to 9% in Rogers.
- College park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 2.5% in Rogers.
Demographics
Demographics Rogers vs College park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rogers | College park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 23 |
| White | 46 | 39 |
| Asian | 3 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 31 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rogers vs College park
- In College park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 1% in Rogers.
- Rogers has a higher percentage of White residents at 46% compared to 39% in College park.
- In College park, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 3% in Rogers.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rogers at 31% compared to 17% in College park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rogers at 18% compared to 7% in College park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rogers at 1% compared to 0% in College park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rogers | College park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 15.4% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 12.8% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rogers vs College park
- More residents in Rogers report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.8% in College park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rogers at 23.7% compared to 15.4% in College park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rogers at 17.6% compared to 12.4% in College park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rogers at 15.3% compared to 12.8% in College park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rogers at 36.7% compared to 36.4% in College park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rogers at 7.0% compared to 5.0% in College park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rogers | College park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (669) | 1.9% (657) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (11,561) | 6.4% (2,199) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (12,987) | 9.4% (3,210) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.0% (14,571) | 19.8% (6,769) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rogers vs College park
- In College park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.9% in Rogers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogers hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 6.4% in College park.
- More residents in Rogers have less than a high school education at 17.8% compared to 9.4% in College park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 19.8% in College park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.