Demographics details for Rogers, AR vs Ash fork, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rogers, AR vs Ash fork, AZ.
| Data | Rogers | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 72,999 | 466 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $78,075 | $79,861 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Rogers vs Ash fork
- In Rogers, the population is higher at 72,999, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- The median age in Ash fork is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 33.4 years in Rogers.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861, compared to $78,075 in Rogers.
- In Ash fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 40.0% in Rogers.
- The poverty level is higher in Ash fork at 10%, compared to 9% in Rogers.
- Ash fork has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 2.5% in Rogers.
Demographics
Demographics Rogers vs Ash fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rogers | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 46 | 79 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 31 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rogers vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rogers at 1% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ash fork at 79% compared to 46% in Rogers.
- The Asian population is larger in Rogers at 3% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rogers at 31% compared to 6% in Ash fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rogers at 18% compared to 15% in Ash fork.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rogers at 1% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rogers | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 30.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rogers vs Ash fork
- In Ash fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.8% in Rogers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rogers at 23.7% compared to 21.4% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 17.6% in Rogers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ash fork at 15.9% compared to 15.3% in Rogers.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rogers at 36.7% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 7.0% in Rogers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rogers | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (669) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (11,561) | 13.1% (61) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (12,987) | 23.6% (110) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.0% (14,571) | 8.8% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rogers vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogers have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogers hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 13.1% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ash fork at 23.6%, compared to 17.8% in Rogers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rogers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.