Demographics details for Rocky river, OH vs Turner, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rocky river, OH vs Turner, OR.
Data | Rocky river | Turner |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,346 | 2,422 |
Median Age | 43.5 years | 38.6 years |
Median Income | $90,459 | $101,292 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 61.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rocky river vs Turner
- In Rocky river, the population is higher at 21,346, compared to 2,422 in Turner.
- Residents in Rocky river have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 38.6 years in Turner.
- Turner has a higher median income of $101,292, compared to $90,459 in Rocky river.
- In Turner, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 46.0% in Rocky river.
- The poverty level is higher in Turner at 5%, compared to 4% in Rocky river.
- The unemployment rate in Rocky river is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Turner.
Demographics
Demographics Rocky river vs Turner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rocky river | Turner |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 92 | 77 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rocky river vs Turner
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rocky river at 1% compared to 0% in Turner.
- Rocky river has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 77% in Turner.
- Both Rocky river and Turner have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Turner has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 2% in Rocky river.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Turner at 5%, compared to 3% in Rocky river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rocky river and Turner at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rocky river | Turner |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.6% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 9.9% |
Depression | 23.2% | 28.2% |
Smoking | 11.5% | 13.7% |
Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 18.0% |
Obesity | 27.0% | 33.6% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rocky river vs Turner
- In Turner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 13.6% in Rocky river.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Turner at 28.2% versus 23.2% in Rocky river.
- Turner has a higher smoking rate at 13.7% compared to 11.5% in Rocky river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rocky river at 20.9% compared to 18.0% in Turner.
- Turner has higher obesity rates at 33.6% compared to 27.0% in Rocky river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rocky river at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Turner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rocky river | Turner |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (157) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 11.1% (2,360) | 12.8% (311) |
Less than High School | 3.6% (758) | 9.2% (223) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 46.4% (9,894) | 23.3% (564) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rocky river vs Turner
- A higher percentage of residents in Rocky river have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Turner.
- In Turner, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.8% compared to 11.1% in Rocky river.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Turner at 9.2%, compared to 3.6% in Rocky river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rocky river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.4% compared to 23.3% in Turner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.