Demographics details for Rockwood, TN vs Washington, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rockwood, TN vs Washington, LA.
Data | Rockwood | Washington |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,538 | 726 |
Median Age | 45.5 years | 26.6 years |
Median Income | $43,309 | $36,719 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Rockwood vs Washington
- In Rockwood, the population is higher at 5,538, compared to 726 in Washington.
- Residents in Rockwood have a higher median age of 45.5 years compared to 26.6 years in Washington.
- Rockwood has a higher median income of $43,309 compared to $36,719 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rockwood at 35.0% compared to 23.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is identical in both Rockwood and Washington at 15%.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.0% in Rockwood.
Demographics
Demographics Rockwood vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rockwood | Washington |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 65 |
White | 92 | 20 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rockwood vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 0% in Rockwood.
- Rockwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 20% in Washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Rockwood at 1% compared to 0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Rockwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 12%, compared to 5% in Rockwood.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rockwood at 1% compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rockwood | Washington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 21.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.9% | 15.3% |
Depression | 29.7% | 25.5% |
Smoking | 27.1% | 26.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 15.1% |
Obesity | 39.7% | 41.5% |
Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rockwood vs Washington
- More residents in Rockwood report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 21.1% in Washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rockwood at 29.7% compared to 25.5% in Washington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rockwood at 27.1% compared to 26.0% in Washington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 15.1% compared to 14.7% in Rockwood.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 39.7% in Rockwood.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rockwood at 28.0% compared to 9.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rockwood | Washington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (35) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 24.6% (1,364) | 20.2% (147) |
Less than High School | 16.5% (915) | 27.7% (201) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.8% (430) | 7.3% (53) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rockwood vs Washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockwood have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockwood hold a high school diploma at 24.6% compared to 20.2% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 27.7%, compared to 16.5% in Rockwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.8% compared to 7.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.