Demographics details for Rockville, MD vs South windsor, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rockville, MD vs South windsor, CT.
| Data | Rockville | South windsor |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 66,924 | 26,054 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $122,470 | $90,964 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 62.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Rockville vs South windsor
- In Rockville, the population is higher at 66,924, compared to 26,054 in South windsor.
- The median age in South windsor is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 38.8 years in Rockville.
- Rockville has a higher median income of $122,470 compared to $90,964 in South windsor.
- In South windsor, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 43.0% in Rockville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Rockville and South windsor at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Rockville is higher at 2.9%, compared to 2.2% in South windsor.
Demographics
Demographics Rockville vs South windsor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rockville | South windsor |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 9 |
| White | 41 | 85 |
| Asian | 23 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rockville vs South windsor
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rockville at 10% compared to 9% in South windsor.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South windsor at 85% compared to 41% in Rockville.
- The Asian population is larger in Rockville at 23% compared to 3% in South windsor.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rockville at 18% compared to 3% in South windsor.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rockville at 8% compared to 2% in South windsor.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rockville and South windsor at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rockville | South windsor |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.6% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 8.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 22.8% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rockville vs South windsor
- More residents in Rockville report poor mental health at 12.6% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rockville at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rockville at 8.4% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rockville at 12.6% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rockville at 22.8% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rockville at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rockville | South windsor |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (749) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 6.7% (4,473) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 8.2% (5,509) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 46.6% (31,165) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rockville vs South windsor
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockville have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockville hold a high school diploma at 6.7% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- More residents in Rockville have less than a high school education at 8.2% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.6% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.