Demographics details for Rockingham, NC vs Waverly, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rockingham, NC vs Waverly, TN.
| Data | Rockingham | Waverly |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 91,957 | 4,297 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 46.7 years |
| Median Income | $50,737 | $43,750 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Rockingham vs Waverly
- In Rockingham, the population is higher at 91,957, compared to 4,297 in Waverly.
- The median age in Waverly is higher at 46.7 years, compared to 45.1 years in Rockingham.
- Rockingham has a higher median income of $50,737 compared to $43,750 in Waverly.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rockingham at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Waverly.
- Rockingham has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Waverly.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Rockingham and Waverly at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Rockingham vs Waverly provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rockingham | Waverly |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 2 |
| White | 70 | 91 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rockingham vs Waverly
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rockingham at 17% compared to 2% in Waverly.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Waverly at 91% compared to 70% in Rockingham.
- The Asian population is larger in Rockingham at 1% compared to 0% in Waverly.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rockingham at 6% compared to 2% in Waverly.
- Both Rockingham and Waverly have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rockingham at 1% compared to 0% in Waverly.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rockingham | Waverly |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 28.8% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 23.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rockingham vs Waverly
- In Waverly, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.7% in Rockingham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waverly at 28.8% versus 24.9% in Rockingham.
- Waverly has a higher smoking rate at 23.6% compared to 20.0% in Rockingham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rockingham at 16.8% compared to 15.6% in Waverly.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rockingham at 39.7% compared to 37.8% in Waverly.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waverly at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Rockingham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rockingham | Waverly |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (738) | 1.0% (41) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (18,325) | 18.4% (792) |
| Less than High School | 20.9% (19,256) | 21.9% (943) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (10,198) | 16.5% (709) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rockingham vs Waverly
- In Waverly, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Rockingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockingham hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 18.4% in Waverly.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waverly at 21.9%, compared to 20.9% in Rockingham.
- In Waverly, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 11.1% in Rockingham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.