Demographics details for Rockingham, NC vs Southlake, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rockingham, NC vs Southlake, TX.
| Data | Rockingham | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 91,957 | 31,102 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $50,737 | $250,001 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Rockingham vs Southlake
- In Rockingham, the population is higher at 91,957, compared to 31,102 in Southlake.
- Residents in Rockingham have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 42.3 years in Southlake.
- Southlake has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $50,737 in Rockingham.
- In Southlake, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 41.0% in Rockingham.
- Rockingham has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Southlake.
- The unemployment rate in Rockingham is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Southlake.
Demographics
Demographics Rockingham vs Southlake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rockingham | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 1 |
| White | 70 | 68 |
| Asian | 1 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rockingham vs Southlake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rockingham at 17% compared to 1% in Southlake.
- Rockingham has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 68% in Southlake.
- In Southlake, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 1% in Rockingham.
- Southlake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 6% in Rockingham.
- Both Rockingham and Southlake have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rockingham at 1% compared to 0% in Southlake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rockingham | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 12.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 7.2% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 27.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rockingham vs Southlake
- More residents in Rockingham report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 12.8% in Southlake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rockingham at 24.9% compared to 21.3% in Southlake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rockingham at 20.0% compared to 8.4% in Southlake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Southlake at 19.4% compared to 16.8% in Rockingham.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rockingham at 39.7% compared to 27.1% in Southlake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rockingham at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Southlake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rockingham | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (738) | 0.0% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (18,325) | 4.2% (1,302) |
| Less than High School | 20.9% (19,256) | 1.3% (392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (10,198) | 46.0% (14,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rockingham vs Southlake
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockingham have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Southlake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockingham hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 4.2% in Southlake.
- More residents in Rockingham have less than a high school education at 20.9% compared to 1.3% in Southlake.
- In Southlake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.0% compared to 11.1% in Rockingham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.