Demographics details for Rockingham, NC vs South milwaukee, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rockingham, NC vs South milwaukee, WI.

Data Rockingham South milwaukee
Population 91,957 20,309
Median Age 45.1 years 41.6 years
Median Income $50,737 $68,801
Married Families 41.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 13% 6%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.9

Population Comparison: Rockingham vs South milwaukee

  • In Rockingham, the population is higher at 91,957, compared to 20,309 in South milwaukee.
  • Residents in Rockingham have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 41.6 years in South milwaukee.
  • South milwaukee has a higher median income of $68,801, compared to $50,737 in Rockingham.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Rockingham at 41.0% compared to 40.0% in South milwaukee.
  • Rockingham has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 6% in South milwaukee.
  • The unemployment rate in Rockingham is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.9% in South milwaukee.

Demographics

Demographics Rockingham vs South milwaukee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rockingham South milwaukee
Black 17 2
White 70 76
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 6 12
Two or More Races 5 7
American Indian 1 2

Demographics Comparison: Rockingham vs South milwaukee

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rockingham at 17% compared to 2% in South milwaukee.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South milwaukee at 76% compared to 70% in Rockingham.
  • Both Rockingham and South milwaukee have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • South milwaukee has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 6% in Rockingham.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South milwaukee at 7%, compared to 5% in Rockingham.
  • In South milwaukee, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Rockingham.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rockingham South milwaukee
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 16.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 10.5%
Depression 24.9% 25.2%
Smoking 20.0% 18.2%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 25.7%
Obesity 39.7% 35.3%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rockingham vs South milwaukee

  • More residents in Rockingham report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.4% in South milwaukee.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South milwaukee at 25.2% versus 24.9% in Rockingham.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Rockingham at 20.0% compared to 18.2% in South milwaukee.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South milwaukee at 25.7% compared to 16.8% in Rockingham.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Rockingham at 39.7% compared to 35.3% in South milwaukee.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Rockingham at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in South milwaukee.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rockingham South milwaukee
No Schooling 0.8% (738) 0.8% (153)
High School Diploma 19.9% (18,325) 24.0% (4,866)
Less than High School 20.9% (19,256) 11.3% (2,285)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.1% (10,198) 19.5% (3,959)

Education Levels Comparison: Rockingham vs South milwaukee

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Rockingham and South milwaukee at 0.8%.
  • In South milwaukee, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.0% compared to 19.9% in Rockingham.
  • More residents in Rockingham have less than a high school education at 20.9% compared to 11.3% in South milwaukee.
  • In South milwaukee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 11.1% in Rockingham.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.