Demographics details for Rockingham, NC vs Prescott valley, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rockingham, NC vs Prescott valley, AZ.

Data Rockingham Prescott valley
Population 91,957 49,075
Median Age 45.1 years 47.7 years
Median Income $50,737 $66,617
Married Families 41.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 13% 6%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.4

Population Comparison: Rockingham vs Prescott valley

  • In Rockingham, the population is higher at 91,957, compared to 49,075 in Prescott valley.
  • The median age in Prescott valley is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 45.1 years in Rockingham.
  • Prescott valley has a higher median income of $66,617, compared to $50,737 in Rockingham.
  • In Prescott valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 41.0% in Rockingham.
  • Rockingham has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 6% in Prescott valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Rockingham is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.4% in Prescott valley.

Demographics

Demographics Rockingham vs Prescott valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rockingham Prescott valley
Black 17 1
White 70 67
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 6 19
Two or More Races 5 11
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Rockingham vs Prescott valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rockingham at 17% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
  • Rockingham has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 67% in Prescott valley.
  • Both Rockingham and Prescott valley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Prescott valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 6% in Rockingham.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Prescott valley at 11%, compared to 5% in Rockingham.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rockingham and Prescott valley at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rockingham Prescott valley
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 11.9%
Depression 24.9% 22.8%
Smoking 20.0% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 16.6%
Obesity 39.7% 28.1%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rockingham vs Prescott valley

  • In Prescott valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.7% in Rockingham.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Rockingham at 24.9% compared to 22.8% in Prescott valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Rockingham at 20.0% compared to 18.5% in Prescott valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Rockingham at 16.8% compared to 16.6% in Prescott valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Rockingham at 39.7% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Rockingham and Prescott valley at 16.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rockingham Prescott valley
No Schooling 0.8% (738) 0.8% (399)
High School Diploma 19.9% (18,325) 17.1% (8,386)
Less than High School 20.9% (19,256) 12.3% (6,044)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.1% (10,198) 15.9% (7,817)

Education Levels Comparison: Rockingham vs Prescott valley

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Rockingham and Prescott valley at 0.8%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rockingham hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 17.1% in Prescott valley.
  • More residents in Rockingham have less than a high school education at 20.9% compared to 12.3% in Prescott valley.
  • In Prescott valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 11.1% in Rockingham.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.