Demographics details for Rockingham, NC vs Paterson, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rockingham, NC vs Paterson, NJ.
| Data | Rockingham | Paterson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 91,957 | 156,661 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $50,737 | $52,092 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 8.8 |
Population Comparison: Rockingham vs Paterson
- The population in Paterson is higher at 156,661, compared to 91,957 in Rockingham.
- Residents in Rockingham have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 33.1 years in Paterson.
- Paterson has a higher median income of $52,092, compared to $50,737 in Rockingham.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rockingham at 41.0% compared to 27.0% in Paterson.
- The poverty level is higher in Paterson at 18%, compared to 13% in Rockingham.
- Paterson has a higher unemployment rate at 8.8% compared to 4.5% in Rockingham.
Demographics
Demographics Rockingham vs Paterson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rockingham | Paterson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 25 |
| White | 70 | Data is updating |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 64 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 17 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rockingham vs Paterson
- In Paterson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 17% in Rockingham.
- Rockingham has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 0% in Paterson.
- In Paterson, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Rockingham.
- Paterson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 6% in Rockingham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Paterson at 17%, compared to 5% in Rockingham.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rockingham at 1% compared to 0% in Paterson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rockingham | Paterson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 16.5% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rockingham vs Paterson
- More residents in Rockingham report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.5% in Paterson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rockingham at 24.9% compared to 16.5% in Paterson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rockingham at 20.0% compared to 17.7% in Paterson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rockingham at 16.8% compared to 13.9% in Paterson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rockingham at 39.7% compared to 38.0% in Paterson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rockingham at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Paterson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rockingham | Paterson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (738) | 2.1% (3,278) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (18,325) | 25.1% (39,354) |
| Less than High School | 20.9% (19,256) | 26.1% (40,961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (10,198) | 7.9% (12,450) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rockingham vs Paterson
- In Paterson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Rockingham.
- In Paterson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 19.9% in Rockingham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Paterson at 26.1%, compared to 20.9% in Rockingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockingham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 7.9% in Paterson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.