Demographics details for Rockingham, NC vs Norway, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rockingham, NC vs Norway, MI.
| Data | Rockingham | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 91,957 | 2,827 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 45.3 years |
| Median Income | $50,737 | $49,261 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Rockingham vs Norway
- In Rockingham, the population is higher at 91,957, compared to 2,827 in Norway.
- The median age in Norway is higher at 45.3 years, compared to 45.1 years in Rockingham.
- Rockingham has a higher median income of $50,737 compared to $49,261 in Norway.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rockingham at 41.0% compared to 38.0% in Norway.
- The poverty level is higher in Norway at 15%, compared to 13% in Rockingham.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Rockingham and Norway at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Rockingham vs Norway provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rockingham | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 1 |
| White | 70 | 96 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rockingham vs Norway
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rockingham at 17% compared to 1% in Norway.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norway at 96% compared to 70% in Rockingham.
- The Asian population is larger in Rockingham at 1% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rockingham at 6% compared to 0% in Norway.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rockingham at 5% compared to 3% in Norway.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rockingham at 1% compared to 0% in Norway.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rockingham | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rockingham vs Norway
- More residents in Rockingham report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.9% in Norway.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Norway at 25.7% versus 24.9% in Rockingham.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rockingham at 20.0% compared to 16.4% in Norway.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norway at 19.1% compared to 16.8% in Rockingham.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rockingham at 39.7% compared to 34.9% in Norway.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Norway at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Rockingham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rockingham | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (738) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (18,325) | 21.9% (618) |
| Less than High School | 20.9% (19,256) | 11.6% (329) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (10,198) | 12.2% (346) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rockingham vs Norway
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockingham have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Norway.
- In Norway, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.9% compared to 19.9% in Rockingham.
- More residents in Rockingham have less than a high school education at 20.9% compared to 11.6% in Norway.
- In Norway, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 11.1% in Rockingham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.