Demographics details for Rockingham, NC vs Forest park, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rockingham, NC vs Forest park, GA.

Data Rockingham Forest park
Population 91,957 19,400
Median Age 45.1 years 31.3 years
Median Income $50,737 $41,837
Married Families 41.0% 23.0%
Poverty Level 13% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Rockingham vs Forest park

  • In Rockingham, the population is higher at 91,957, compared to 19,400 in Forest park.
  • Residents in Rockingham have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
  • Rockingham has a higher median income of $50,737 compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Rockingham at 41.0% compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
  • Rockingham has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Forest park.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Rockingham and Forest park at 4.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Rockingham vs Forest park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rockingham Forest park
Black 17 55
White 70 8
Asian 1 6
Hispanic 6 23
Two or More Races 5 8
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Rockingham vs Forest park

  • In Forest park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 17% in Rockingham.
  • Rockingham has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 8% in Forest park.
  • In Forest park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Rockingham.
  • Forest park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 6% in Rockingham.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest park at 8%, compared to 5% in Rockingham.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rockingham at 1% compared to 0% in Forest park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rockingham Forest park
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 16.0%
Depression 24.9% 17.8%
Smoking 20.0% 22.7%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 13.3%
Obesity 39.7% 43.0%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rockingham vs Forest park

  • In Forest park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.7% in Rockingham.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Rockingham at 24.9% compared to 17.8% in Forest park.
  • Forest park has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 20.0% in Rockingham.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Rockingham at 16.8% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
  • Forest park has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 39.7% in Rockingham.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Rockingham at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Forest park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rockingham Forest park
No Schooling 0.8% (738) 2.6% (504)
High School Diploma 19.9% (18,325) 18.4% (3,567)
Less than High School 20.9% (19,256) 21.7% (4,202)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.1% (10,198) 6.4% (1,235)

Education Levels Comparison: Rockingham vs Forest park

  • In Forest park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.8% in Rockingham.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rockingham hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 18.4% in Forest park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest park at 21.7%, compared to 20.9% in Rockingham.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rockingham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.