Demographics details for Rockingham, NC vs Evarts, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rockingham, NC vs Evarts, KY.
| Data | Rockingham | Evarts |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 91,957 | 834 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $50,737 | $32,222 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Rockingham vs Evarts
- In Rockingham, the population is higher at 91,957, compared to 834 in Evarts.
- Residents in Rockingham have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 40.3 years in Evarts.
- Rockingham has a higher median income of $50,737 compared to $32,222 in Evarts.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rockingham at 41.0% compared to 39.0% in Evarts.
- The poverty level is higher in Evarts at 20%, compared to 13% in Rockingham.
- Evarts has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Rockingham.
Demographics
Demographics Rockingham vs Evarts provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rockingham | Evarts |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 2 |
| White | 70 | 93 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rockingham vs Evarts
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rockingham at 17% compared to 2% in Evarts.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Evarts at 93% compared to 70% in Rockingham.
- The Asian population is larger in Rockingham at 1% compared to 0% in Evarts.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rockingham at 6% compared to 2% in Evarts.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rockingham at 5% compared to 3% in Evarts.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rockingham at 1% compared to 0% in Evarts.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rockingham | Evarts |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 25.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 22.3% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 32.1% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 36.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 12.5% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 47.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rockingham vs Evarts
- In Evarts, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 25.3% compared to 17.7% in Rockingham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Evarts at 32.1% versus 24.9% in Rockingham.
- Evarts has a higher smoking rate at 36.5% compared to 20.0% in Rockingham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rockingham at 16.8% compared to 12.5% in Evarts.
- Evarts has higher obesity rates at 47.5% compared to 39.7% in Rockingham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Evarts at 30.0% compared to 16.0% in Rockingham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rockingham | Evarts |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (738) | 1.7% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (18,325) | 22.8% (190) |
| Less than High School | 20.9% (19,256) | 45.6% (380) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (10,198) | 7.3% (61) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rockingham vs Evarts
- In Evarts, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.8% in Rockingham.
- In Evarts, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 19.9% in Rockingham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Evarts at 45.6%, compared to 20.9% in Rockingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockingham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 7.3% in Evarts.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.