Demographics details for Rockholds, KY vs Cudahy, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rockholds, KY vs Cudahy, WI.
| Data | Rockholds | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 369 | 17,796 |
| Median Age | 46.1 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $42,063 | $66,592 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rockholds vs Cudahy
- The population in Cudahy is higher at 17,796, compared to 369 in Rockholds.
- Residents in Rockholds have a higher median age of 46.1 years compared to 42.4 years in Cudahy.
- Cudahy has a higher median income of $66,592, compared to $42,063 in Rockholds.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rockholds at 43.0% compared to 39.0% in Cudahy.
- Rockholds has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Cudahy.
- The unemployment rate in Rockholds is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Cudahy.
Demographics
Demographics Rockholds vs Cudahy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rockholds | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 100 | 77 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 9 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rockholds vs Cudahy
- In Cudahy, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Rockholds.
- Rockholds has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 77% in Cudahy.
- In Cudahy, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Rockholds.
- Cudahy has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Rockholds.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cudahy at 9%, compared to 0% in Rockholds.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rockholds and Cudahy at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rockholds | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.4% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.4% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 32.6% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 28.7% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 26.4% |
| Obesity | 43.5% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 40.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rockholds vs Cudahy
- More residents in Rockholds report poor mental health at 22.4% compared to 15.5% in Cudahy.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rockholds at 32.6% compared to 24.3% in Cudahy.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rockholds at 28.7% compared to 16.4% in Cudahy.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 14.0% in Rockholds.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rockholds at 43.5% compared to 34.2% in Cudahy.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rockholds at 40.0% compared to 16.0% in Cudahy.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rockholds | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (166) |
| High School Diploma | 39.8% (147) | 25.1% (4,460) |
| Less than High School | 32.5% (120) | 9.9% (1,768) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.7% (10) | 21.0% (3,730) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rockholds vs Cudahy
- In Cudahy, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Rockholds.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockholds hold a high school diploma at 39.8% compared to 25.1% in Cudahy.
- More residents in Rockholds have less than a high school education at 32.5% compared to 9.9% in Cudahy.
- In Cudahy, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 2.7% in Rockholds.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.