Demographics details for Rockford, WA vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rockford, WA vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Rockford | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 565 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 50.4 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $68,750 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Rockford vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 565 in Rockford.
- Residents in Rockford have a higher median age of 50.4 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367, compared to $68,750 in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rockford at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 0% in Rockford.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 4.2% in Rockford.
Demographics
Demographics Rockford vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rockford | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 21 |
| White | 84 | 10 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 18 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rockford vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 0% in Rockford.
- Rockford has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Rockford.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 4% in Rockford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 10% in Rockford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rockford at 2% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rockford | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 28.8% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rockford vs Lancaster
- More residents in Rockford report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.8% in Lancaster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rockford at 28.8% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rockford at 15.2% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rockford at 18.4% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 29.9% in Rockford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rockford at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rockford | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 11.9% (67) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (42) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (73) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rockford vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Rockford.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 11.9% in Rockford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 7.4% in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.