Demographics details for Rockford, WA vs Kelso, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rockford, WA vs Kelso, TN.
Data | Rockford | Kelso |
---|---|---|
Population | 565 | 185 |
Median Age | 50.4 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $68,750 | $60,000 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 70.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rockford vs Kelso
- In Rockford, the population is higher at 565, compared to 185 in Kelso.
- Residents in Rockford have a higher median age of 50.4 years compared to 42.0 years in Kelso.
- Rockford has a higher median income of $68,750 compared to $60,000 in Kelso.
- In Kelso, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 33.0% in Rockford.
- The poverty level is higher in Kelso at 13%, compared to 0% in Rockford.
- The unemployment rate in Rockford is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Kelso.
Demographics
Demographics Rockford vs Kelso provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rockford | Kelso |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 84 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 10 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rockford vs Kelso
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Rockford and Kelso at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kelso at 100% compared to 84% in Rockford.
- Both Rockford and Kelso have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rockford at 4% compared to 0% in Kelso.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rockford at 10% compared to 0% in Kelso.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rockford at 2% compared to 0% in Kelso.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rockford | Kelso |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 28.8% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 15.2% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 29.9% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rockford vs Kelso
- More residents in Rockford report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rockford at 28.8% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rockford at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rockford at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rockford at 29.9% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rockford at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rockford | Kelso |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 11.9% (67) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 7.4% (42) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (73) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rockford vs Kelso
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Rockford and Kelso at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockford hold a high school diploma at 11.9% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- More residents in Rockford have less than a high school education at 7.4% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.