Demographics details for Rockford, WA vs Friendship, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rockford, WA vs Friendship, WI.
| Data | Rockford | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 565 | 681 |
| Median Age | 50.4 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $68,750 | $45,208 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Rockford vs Friendship
- The population in Friendship is higher at 681, compared to 565 in Rockford.
- Residents in Rockford have a higher median age of 50.4 years compared to 50.3 years in Friendship.
- Rockford has a higher median income of $68,750 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Rockford and Friendship at 33.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Friendship at 12%, compared to 0% in Rockford.
- Friendship has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Rockford.
Demographics
Demographics Rockford vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rockford | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 84 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rockford vs Friendship
- In Friendship, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Rockford.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Rockford and Friendship at 84%.
- Both Rockford and Friendship have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rockford at 4% compared to 1% in Friendship.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rockford at 10% compared to 9% in Friendship.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rockford at 2% compared to 1% in Friendship.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rockford | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 28.8% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 23.9% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rockford vs Friendship
- More residents in Rockford report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rockford at 28.8% compared to 24.3% in Friendship.
- Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 15.2% in Rockford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 18.4% in Rockford.
- Friendship has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 29.9% in Rockford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rockford at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Friendship.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rockford | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 11.9% (67) | 26.9% (183) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (42) | 26.0% (177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (73) | 3.2% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rockford vs Friendship
- In Friendship, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Rockford.
- In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 11.9% in Rockford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friendship at 26.0%, compared to 7.4% in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.