Demographics details for Rockdale, TX vs Lexington, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rockdale, TX vs Lexington, KY.
| Data | Rockdale | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,529 | 320,347 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $39,911 | $66,087 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Rockdale vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 320,347, compared to 5,529 in Rockdale.
- Residents in Rockdale have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 35.2 years in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher median income of $66,087, compared to $39,911 in Rockdale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rockdale at 37.0% compared to 36.0% in Lexington.
- Rockdale has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Rockdale.
Demographics
Demographics Rockdale vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rockdale | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 15 |
| White | 50 | 68 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 36 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rockdale vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 9% in Rockdale.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lexington at 68% compared to 50% in Rockdale.
- In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Rockdale.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rockdale at 36% compared to 7% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 6%, compared to 5% in Rockdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rockdale and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rockdale | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rockdale vs Lexington
- More residents in Rockdale report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 17.1% in Lexington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rockdale at 25.1% compared to 24.0% in Lexington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rockdale at 22.3% compared to 17.0% in Lexington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rockdale at 16.9% compared to 15.9% in Lexington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rockdale at 40.0% compared to 36.0% in Lexington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Rockdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rockdale | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (90) | 0.6% (2,032) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (1,160) | 9.9% (31,844) |
| Less than High School | 23.0% (1,272) | 8.7% (27,787) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.7% (589) | 30.4% (97,540) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rockdale vs Lexington
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockdale have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.6% in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockdale hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 9.9% in Lexington.
- More residents in Rockdale have less than a high school education at 23.0% compared to 8.7% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 10.7% in Rockdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.