Demographics details for Rock springs, WY vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rock springs, WY vs South jordan, UT.
Data | Rock springs | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,021 | 83,513 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $75,863 | $119,822 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Rock springs vs South jordan
- The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 23,021 in Rock springs.
- Residents in Rock springs have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $75,863 in Rock springs.
- In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 38.0% in Rock springs.
- Rock springs has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.2% in Rock springs.
Demographics
Demographics Rock springs vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rock springs | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 71 | 83 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 16 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rock springs vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rock springs at 2% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South jordan at 83% compared to 71% in Rock springs.
- In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Rock springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rock springs at 16% compared to 7% in South jordan.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rock springs at 9% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rock springs and South jordan at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rock springs | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 9.0% |
Depression | 20.1% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 17.9% | 7.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 34.0% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rock springs vs South jordan
- In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.1% in Rock springs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 20.1% in Rock springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rock springs at 17.9% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rock springs at 17.6% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rock springs at 34.0% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rock springs at 15.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rock springs | South jordan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (234) | 0.2% (172) |
High School Diploma | 15.5% (3,575) | 8.4% (6,995) |
Less than High School | 9.6% (2,204) | 2.7% (2,236) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (3,211) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rock springs vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of residents in Rock springs have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rock springs hold a high school diploma at 15.5% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- More residents in Rock springs have less than a high school education at 9.6% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 13.9% in Rock springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.