Demographics details for Rock falls, IL vs Westminster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rock falls, IL vs Westminster, CA.
Data | Rock falls | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,620 | 89,397 |
Median Age | 38.2 years | 41.6 years |
Median Income | $48,390 | $80,271 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Rock falls vs Westminster
- The population in Westminster is higher at 89,397, compared to 8,620 in Rock falls.
- The median age in Westminster is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 38.2 years in Rock falls.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $80,271, compared to $48,390 in Rock falls.
- In Westminster, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 30.0% in Rock falls.
- Rock falls has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Westminster.
- Westminster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.1% in Rock falls.
Demographics
Demographics Rock falls vs Westminster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rock falls | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 65 | 16 |
Asian | Data is updating | 51 |
Hispanic | 23 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rock falls vs Westminster
- In Westminster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Rock falls.
- Rock falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 16% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, the Asian population stands at 51%, greater than 0% in Rock falls.
- Westminster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 23% in Rock falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rock falls at 12% compared to 8% in Westminster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rock falls and Westminster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rock falls | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 10.8% |
Depression | 22.9% | 15.3% |
Smoking | 19.7% | 12.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 13.0% |
Obesity | 39.1% | 23.4% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rock falls vs Westminster
- More residents in Rock falls report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.9% in Westminster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rock falls at 22.9% compared to 15.3% in Westminster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rock falls at 19.7% compared to 12.5% in Westminster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rock falls at 17.9% compared to 13.0% in Westminster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rock falls at 39.1% compared to 23.4% in Westminster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rock falls at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Westminster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rock falls | Westminster |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (47) | 4.5% (4,006) |
High School Diploma | 22.7% (1,958) | 16.0% (14,303) |
Less than High School | 18.4% (1,586) | 21.5% (19,217) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (858) | 18.5% (16,558) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rock falls vs Westminster
- In Westminster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.5% in Rock falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rock falls hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 16.0% in Westminster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Westminster at 21.5%, compared to 18.4% in Rock falls.
- In Westminster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 10.0% in Rock falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.