Demographics details for Rock falls, IL vs Wadesboro, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rock falls, IL vs Wadesboro, NC.
Data | Rock falls | Wadesboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,620 | 4,966 |
Median Age | 38.2 years | 38.3 years |
Median Income | $48,390 | $32,022 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Rock falls vs Wadesboro
- In Rock falls, the population is higher at 8,620, compared to 4,966 in Wadesboro.
- The median age in Wadesboro is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 38.2 years in Rock falls.
- Rock falls has a higher median income of $48,390 compared to $32,022 in Wadesboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rock falls at 30.0% compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.
- Rock falls has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- Wadesboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.1% in Rock falls.
Demographics
Demographics Rock falls vs Wadesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rock falls | Wadesboro |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 70 |
White | 65 | 25 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 23 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 12 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rock falls vs Wadesboro
- In Wadesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 0% in Rock falls.
- Rock falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 25% in Wadesboro.
- In Wadesboro, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Rock falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rock falls at 23% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rock falls at 12% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rock falls and Wadesboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rock falls | Wadesboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 13.7% |
Depression | 22.9% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 19.7% | 22.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 13.9% |
Obesity | 39.1% | 44.3% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rock falls vs Wadesboro
- In Wadesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.1% in Rock falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rock falls at 22.9% compared to 21.6% in Wadesboro.
- Wadesboro has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 19.7% in Rock falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rock falls at 17.9% compared to 13.9% in Wadesboro.
- Wadesboro has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 39.1% in Rock falls.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Rock falls and Wadesboro at 20.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rock falls | Wadesboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (47) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 22.7% (1,958) | 19.2% (953) |
Less than High School | 18.4% (1,586) | 11.8% (587) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (858) | 9.5% (472) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rock falls vs Wadesboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Rock falls have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Wadesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rock falls hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 19.2% in Wadesboro.
- More residents in Rock falls have less than a high school education at 18.4% compared to 11.8% in Wadesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rock falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.0% compared to 9.5% in Wadesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.