Demographics details for Rock falls, IL vs Sitka, AK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rock falls, IL vs Sitka, AK.
| Data | Rock falls | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,620 | 8,382 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $48,390 | $95,261 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Rock falls vs Sitka
- In Rock falls, the population is higher at 8,620, compared to 8,382 in Sitka.
- The median age in Sitka is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 38.2 years in Rock falls.
- Sitka has a higher median income of $95,261, compared to $48,390 in Rock falls.
- In Sitka, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 30.0% in Rock falls.
- Rock falls has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 8% in Sitka.
- Sitka has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 3.1% in Rock falls.
Demographics
Demographics Rock falls vs Sitka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rock falls | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 65 | 57 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 8 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 9 |
Demographics Comparison: Rock falls vs Sitka
- In Sitka, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Rock falls.
- Rock falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 57% in Sitka.
- In Sitka, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Rock falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rock falls at 23% compared to 7% in Sitka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sitka at 18%, compared to 12% in Rock falls.
- In Sitka, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 9%, compared to 0% in Rock falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rock falls | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 18.7% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 31.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rock falls vs Sitka
- More residents in Rock falls report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.6% in Sitka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rock falls at 22.9% compared to 18.7% in Sitka.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rock falls at 19.7% compared to 16.4% in Sitka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sitka at 19.3% compared to 17.9% in Rock falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rock falls at 39.1% compared to 31.7% in Sitka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rock falls at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Sitka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rock falls | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (47) | 0.4% (33) |
| High School Diploma | 22.7% (1,958) | 16.7% (1,396) |
| Less than High School | 18.4% (1,586) | 5.8% (486) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (858) | 24.8% (2,076) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rock falls vs Sitka
- A higher percentage of residents in Rock falls have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Sitka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rock falls hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 16.7% in Sitka.
- More residents in Rock falls have less than a high school education at 18.4% compared to 5.8% in Sitka.
- In Sitka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 10.0% in Rock falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.