Demographics details for Rock falls, IL vs Fairborn, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rock falls, IL vs Fairborn, OH.
| Data | Rock falls | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,620 | 34,977 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $48,390 | $53,783 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Rock falls vs Fairborn
- The population in Fairborn is higher at 34,977, compared to 8,620 in Rock falls.
- Residents in Rock falls have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 35.1 years in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher median income of $53,783, compared to $48,390 in Rock falls.
- In Fairborn, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 30.0% in Rock falls.
- Rock falls has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.1% in Rock falls.
Demographics
Demographics Rock falls vs Fairborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rock falls | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 65 | 78 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rock falls vs Fairborn
- In Fairborn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Rock falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairborn at 78% compared to 65% in Rock falls.
- In Fairborn, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Rock falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rock falls at 23% compared to 4% in Fairborn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rock falls at 12% compared to 8% in Fairborn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rock falls and Fairborn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rock falls | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rock falls vs Fairborn
- In Fairborn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.1% in Rock falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairborn at 23.4% versus 22.9% in Rock falls.
- Fairborn has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 19.7% in Rock falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rock falls at 17.9% compared to 16.3% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 39.1% in Rock falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rock falls at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Fairborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rock falls | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (47) | 0.3% (116) |
| High School Diploma | 22.7% (1,958) | 13.2% (4,620) |
| Less than High School | 18.4% (1,586) | 12.5% (4,382) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (858) | 19.4% (6,782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rock falls vs Fairborn
- A higher percentage of residents in Rock falls have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rock falls hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 13.2% in Fairborn.
- More residents in Rock falls have less than a high school education at 18.4% compared to 12.5% in Fairborn.
- In Fairborn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 10.0% in Rock falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.