Demographics details for Rock falls, IL vs Chandler, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rock falls, IL vs Chandler, AZ.
| Data | Rock falls | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,620 | 280,711 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $48,390 | $99,374 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Rock falls vs Chandler
- The population in Chandler is higher at 280,711, compared to 8,620 in Rock falls.
- Residents in Rock falls have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 37.0 years in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $99,374, compared to $48,390 in Rock falls.
- In Chandler, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 30.0% in Rock falls.
- Rock falls has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 6% in Chandler.
- The unemployment rate in Rock falls is higher at 3.1%, compared to 3.0% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Rock falls vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rock falls | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 65 | 48 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Rock falls vs Chandler
- In Chandler, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Rock falls.
- Rock falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 48% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Rock falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rock falls at 23% compared to 21% in Chandler.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rock falls at 12% compared to 11% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Rock falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rock falls | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 27.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rock falls vs Chandler
- More residents in Rock falls report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.4% in Chandler.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rock falls at 22.9% compared to 18.5% in Chandler.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rock falls at 19.7% compared to 11.8% in Chandler.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chandler at 18.2% compared to 17.9% in Rock falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rock falls at 39.1% compared to 27.9% in Chandler.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rock falls at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Chandler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rock falls | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (47) | 0.8% (2,196) |
| High School Diploma | 22.7% (1,958) | 10.1% (28,272) |
| Less than High School | 18.4% (1,586) | 6.8% (18,988) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (858) | 31.0% (86,947) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rock falls vs Chandler
- In Chandler, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Rock falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rock falls hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 10.1% in Chandler.
- More residents in Rock falls have less than a high school education at 18.4% compared to 6.8% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 10.0% in Rock falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.